Dear Prime Minister: Create a student-loan-style scheme for start-ups
Entrepreneur Pete Boswell believes his idea for the government would help start-ups survive. Do you agree?
Dear Prime Minister is a new series inviting our readers to share your views on how to make Britain’s businesses and economy stronger. Had a lightbulb moment? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
The Right Honourable David Cameron
10 Downing Street
London SW1A 2AA
21 June 2012
Dear Prime Minister,
My proposal to create an Entrepreneur Loans Scheme
It’s time for entrepreneurs to hold this government to account on its promise to be the most enterprise-friendly in our history. I’m not advocating rioting in the streets or poking royalty with a stick. But students managed to bring the streets of London to a standstill in December 2010, demanding the scrapping of tuition fees.
Entrepreneurs should be campaigning with as much vigour for the exact opposite – a way to revive and accelerate the economy through their own businesses.
Why? Unemployment statistics may be slowly edging in the right direction, down by 51,00, to 2.61 million, in the three months to April. But the increase in private sector employment remains worryingly slow, especially amongst those aged 16-30. Currently the contributions-based unemployment benefit bill stands at nearly £3.bn.
This is where start-ups come in. They’re innovative, flexible and not constrained by expectations of rigid process. There’s a natural synergy between the needs of start-ups those of Generation Y. Start-ups can connect those with lower salary demands and in need of experience with dynamic businesses who require fresh and motivated talent, prepared to work outside of the box of traditional employment.
Worryingly, of the 4.5 million small businesses in the UK, less than 30% create any direct employment. There appear to be no hard statistics tracking the failure rates of the UK’s start-up businesses, but it’s generally accepted that around 50% of new businesses will fail to make it past year one, while 90% cease trading within the next few years. The majority of those businesses fail simply because of a lack of capital and cash flow at critical stages in their growth.
The government recently unveiled a £100bn package of support aimed at helping banks increase lending levels to SMEs. But banks have never been good at leading to start-ups or small businesses. Start-ups didn’t meet the banks’ strict risk profiling even before the global economic crisis, so why on earth would they start lending to them now?
We need to get past the concept of George Osborne giving billions to banks and focus instead on putting cash directly in the hands of those individuals willing to build businesses.
That is where we need a completely new way of thinking – and I have an idea just for that.
Most entrepreneurs I know including myself have self-funded or “boot strapped” their start-up at huge personal financial risk. Despite the public perception of men in suits with vast mansions, fast cars and stacks of £50 notes on the coffee table, many would-be business builders give up paid employment, invest their savings, take out loans against their family homes and rack up credit card debits in order to finance the countries next wave of innovative businesses.
I’ve seen, time and again, start-up founders with great ideas and with the potential to be highly successful having to return to part-time jobs to support their families, while spending every spare moment of their 20-hour days working on their start-up. This may be far removed from good telly, but it’s reality.
If the UK wants to regain a seat at the top-table of innovation, we need to invest in those brave enough to take the risk and who set out to create their own vision of the future.
Let’s ditch the bureaucracy and invest directly in entrepreneurs and the return on the taxpayers investment is potentially massive.
Forget the brain-numbingly insignificant £82.5m Start-Up Loan Scheme, which just doesn’t cut it for me I’m afraid. It’s little more than political showmanship. Don’t get me wrong, I believe wholeheartedly in investing in young people; but why not invest in every entrepreneur who shows the willingness and potential to build a business that could create employment opportunities and pay taxes?
My idea is to instead put £10bn, taken from the £100bn government package to increase bank lending to SMES, directly into the hands of capable new business owners who make the grade. The money would come through a student loans-style-model.
Let’s replicate the model which provides tuition fee loans of up to £9,000 and maintenance loans to the individual of £6,000 each year, for the first three years of a business’ life. Rather than making loans to businesses, we should provide these loans direct to entrepreneurs, against future personal earnings from this business or other revenue sources.
Supporting the 180,000 new businesses in the UK to the tune of £15,000 a year for the first three years of life would cost the taxpayer approximately £10bn a year by 2015.
The rates would mirror the student loan and be fixed for a year on 1 September, based on the inflation rate (RPI) in the previous year - meaning it would currently be 6.6%.
After the final year of the loan, payment being made, the entrepreneur must repay 9% of everything earned above £21,000 a year. So earn £22,000 and you’ll repay £90 a year; earn £36,000 and its £1,350 a year, until such time as the full loan is repaid.
Many businesses would still fail, I don’t doubt it. But with the right support network, I can assure you fewer businesses would fail – and, critically, I believe many more people would start-up businesses.
A new body representing entrepreneurs could offer professional development, skills and mentoring in a way that quite frankly the thousands of existing bodies have failed to deliver. We would finally have a national drive for small business which is purposeful.
Of course, there will be those who default or who avoid the repayment threshold. But unlike financing student loans for those studying degrees in low-paid professions such as the performing arts or sciences, the default rate with entrepreneur loans is likely to be far lower. The taxpayer therefore would not be left out of pocket.
More businesses mean more employment opportunities, greater taxation for the treasury, falling benefit costs, higher consumer spending, and of course interest and capital repayments on the loans.
An Entrepreneur Loans Scheme would mean far more than banks lending to small businesses; it would be the UK investing in its best and brightest. It would be an act of faith in those building the next generation of cutting-edge businesses, and in young people who stand so much to gain from the increased employment opportunities.
Of course, it won’t be for every entrepreneur. But for those risking crippling debt it would literally be business changing.
What do you think of Pete’s idea? Leave your comments below
Dear Prime Ministeris a new series inviting our readers to share your views on how to make Britain’s businesses and economy stronger. Had a lightbulb moment? Email email@example.com.
Pete Boswell is a prolific serial technology entrepreneur who has designed and delivered a number of award-winning software applications including PowerPressed and BluBox. His latest venture, Photo Legacy, is a rapidly expanding digital photography service, with a host of global partners including Tesco and Jessops