Here's how much FTSE 100 pay has reduced by

New figures show 

New analysis of the 2017 AGM season voting data by the Investment Association shows that, at a critical time for pay policy renewal, investors are effectively holding FTSE100 and FTSE250 companies and their individual directors to account on executive remuneration.

Many FTSE100 companies who saw large shareholder votes against pay in 2016, have on the whole submitted more conservative pay policies in 2017 for their executive teams, which were more in line with shareholder expectations. These policies were up for their 3-year renewal this year and rebellions on all remuneration resolutions in the FTSE100 were down from 14 in 2016 to 9 in 2017.

FTSE250 firms on the other hand saw dissent amongst shareholders double from 2016 levels, with 29 companies seeing votes with more than 20 per cent dissent, up from 15 in 2016.

Shareholders are also turning up the heat on individual director accountability at this year’s AGMs, with votes cast against individual directors soaring 525 per cent, from 4 directors in 2016 to 21 directors in 2017 seeing 20 per cent or more votes against. 

The 2017 AGM season also saw a new trend of several FTSE350 companies withdrawing resolutions on executive pay packages ahead of shareholders voting, due to concerns over significant investor rebellion.

Chris Cummings, CEO of the Investment Association, said:

“Data from the 2017 AGM season shows that investors are flexing their muscles and holding big business to account.

“Executive pay amongst the UK’s largest companies is starting to decline to a level more in line with shareholder expectations. There is still some way to go, but a strong signal has been sent to boardrooms around the country that investors won’t tolerate rewards that are out of line with company performance and have concerns about executives’ spiralling pay.  

“Well-run and well-performing companies that yield long-term shareholder returns are critical to ensuring that British savers and pensioners are able to lead more prosperous lives into their later years.” 

Business Minister, Margot James MP, said:

“The UK’s largest companies are showing encouraging signs that they are listening to shareholders and wider concerns about executive pay. But with an increase in the number of shareholder rebellions at FTSE 250 firms over bosses’ pay packets - we cannot afford to take our eye off the ball.

“Our responsible business reforms, which will be published shortly, will improve boardroom accountability and enhance our reputation as one of the best places in the world to work, invest and do business.”

The 2017 AGM season was a particularly crucial year for listed companies, since most had to renew their Remuneration Policy which was voted on for the first time with a binding vote in 2014, following the introduction of new government legislation in 2013. This policy is renewable on a three year term and shareholders must now consider the renewal of executive pay proposals for the next three years until 2020.

The IA has long called for more flexible and simpler remuneration. In October 2016, the IA wrote to FTSE350 on executive pay, setting out shareholder expectation and called for the publication of pay ratios, instructing the FTSE350 to improve the disclosure of bonus targets under Government’s Corporate Governance Reform Green paper proposals.

Social Bookmarks