Is Channel 4 about to be privatised? We look at the evidence

A photographer caught a snap of a secret document

The government has refused to confirm if there are plans in place to privatise Channel 4.

A picture taken by political photographer Steve Back showed a document that appeared to feature privatisation options for the non-profit television network.

 

In response to the photograph, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport said: “Channel 4 has an important remit and we are looking at a range of options as to how to continue to deliver this, including options put forward by Channel 4.”

This isn’t the first time the privatisation of the station has been mooted. Plans have been drawn up and ditched in the past and, in fact, back in August we noted Channel 4 was among a number of publicly-owned assets the government was considering selling.

In a bid to raise £32bn, George Osborne has sold a number of assets, including the UK-owned stake in the Eurostar, Lloyds Bank and the student loans book.

RBS, the Royal Mail and a number of other assets are in the process of being sold.

The government has moved 19 assets into a company it owns, including Channel 4 and the Met Office, and has said it will sell some of these assets in order to raise £12bn.

Channel 4 is likely to be one of these, as some of the others, such as Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and the National Nuclear Laboratory could not feasibly be privatised.

Here’s the list:

  • CDC Group
  • Channel 4
  • Companies House
  • Electricity Settlements Company
  • Insolvency Service
  • Land Registry
  • London and Continental Railways
  • Low Carbon Contracts Company
  • Met Office
  • NATS
  • Nuclear Decommissioning Authority
  • National Nuclear Laboratory
  • Nuclear Liabilities Fund
  • Ordnance Survey
  • Post Office
  • The Royal Mint
  • UK Export Finance
  • Urenco
  • Working Links

 

NOW READ

Unhappy woman

Young people have “stifling” levels of debt

Exhaust fumes car diesel

VW used the same fraudulent emissions tech in Europe as in US, company admits

Readers' comments (2)

  • How convenient, seems like who ever was holding the document was working with the photographer, whether this company is for sale or not,should this person behave in such a way, leaking documents is still a criminal offence I thought!! and a breech of his employment contract, lets get a grip.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment


  • Am Queen Harton by name, I live in Texas, United State Of America, who have been a scam victim to so many fake lenders online between March last year till June this year but i thank my creator so much that he has finally smiled on me by directing me to this new lender who put a smile on my face by not deceiving or lying to me but however this lender whose name is Mr Michael David gave me a business loan which amount is $ 70,000usd,after my agreement to their company terms and conditions and one significant thing i love about this loan company is its fast service and also its God fearing attitude for not been like other fake lenders online who scammed me before now by asking me to bring fees upon fees without getting the results of all those fees payment that i made to them but all the same I still give glory to God that my storm is over now and am now that busy woman that i used to be and also my business is now growing here in my country because i now have much capital to do my business properly before the year runs out without having to go and meet my bank for any assistant .Thank you Mr Michael David for this dream come through and i promise to try all my best to refer your loan company to others who are in need currently just as the way i once was .. thanks so much over and over a again and may God guide you all . here is their email to contact them if you need loan too ..Email..michaeldavid364@gmail.com

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Social Bookmarks